Background: Duodenal ulcer perforation is a common emergency in south India
, with about 100-120 cases being treated at Jawaharalal Institute of Post G
raduate Medical Education and Research each year. The routine to elate has
been to leave two tube drains: one in the Morrison's pouch and one in the p
elvis after omental patch closure. This study was conducted to test the eff
icacy and safety of drain usage routinely after duodenal ulcer perforation
closure with Roscoe Graham omental patch technique.
Methods: In this prospective controlled study, 44 patients formed the test
group (without drains) and 75 patients formed the control group (with abdom
inal drainage). Only patients of perforated duodenal ulcer closed with Rosc
oe Graham omental patch technique were included in the study. The incidence
of postoperative fever, wound infection, rime for return of bowel function
and duration of hospital stay were noted. Details of drainage noted were t
he mean amount of daily drainage, mean time of drain removal and occurrence
of drain-related complications. Peritoneal fluid, wound discharges, drain
tips and drain wounds were cultured. Abdominal ultrasound was performed in
all patients in the second postoperative week or if earlier indicated to de
tect intra-abdominal collections.
Results: It was found that there was no difference in incidence or duration
of postoperative pyrexia, return of bowel function or postoperative hospit
al stay between the two groups. Routine use of drains was not effective in
preventing postoperative fluid collection nor in decreasing the incidence o
f intra-abdominal abscesses. The migration of bacteria from the exterior to
the peritoneal cavity via the drain was also demonstrated. Drains were fou
nd to cause morbidity including intestinal obstruction.
Conclusion: The routine use of drains was found to be neither safe nor effe
ctive in patients of perforated duodenal ulcer treated by omental patch clo
sure.