Jm. Heit et al., COMPARISON OF CEFTRIAXONE WITH PENICILLIN FOR ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS FOR COMPOUND MANDIBLE FRACTURES, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics, 83(4), 1997, pp. 423-426
Purpose. The purpose of the study was to compare the efficacy and cost
of two antibiotic regimens for prophylaxis of I compound mandible fra
ctures: 1 gm/day ceftriaxone and 2 million U penicillin G every 4 hour
s. Design. A prospective study of 90 patients with compound mandible f
ractures was performed. The patients were randomized to the two antibi
otic regimens. The surgical procedures were performed by oral/maxillof
acial surgery residents at a large urban training center. Standard tre
atment consisted of open reduction with either bone plates or wires, w
ith all patients receiving 6 weeks of maxillomandibular fixation. The
patients were monitored at 2-week intervals for 8 weeks by two of the
authors, who were blinded to which antibiotic regimen the patient was
assigned. Results. Two patients in each group had postoperative infect
ions within the first 2 weeks of treatment. The infections resolved wi
th local wound care, removal of internal fixation devices, and oral an
tibiotics. After resolution of the infection each patient had a maluni
on, which was managed without additional complications. The cost diffe
rence between the two treatment regimens was approximately $350 per da
y. Conclusion. Ceftriaxone was noted to be an efficacious and cost-eff
ective treatment alternative to penicillin G for compound mandible fra
cture antibiotic prophylaxis.