Flow cytometric cell cycle analysis of cultured porcine fetal fibroblast cells

Citation
Ac. Boquest et al., Flow cytometric cell cycle analysis of cultured porcine fetal fibroblast cells, BIOL REPROD, 60(4), 1999, pp. 1013-1019
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
da verificare
Journal title
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION
ISSN journal
00063363 → ACNP
Volume
60
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1013 - 1019
Database
ISI
SICI code
0006-3363(199904)60:4<1013:FCCCAO>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Normal development of nuclear transfer embryos is thought to be dependent o n transferral of nuclei in GO or G1 phases of the cell cycle. Therefore, we investigated the cell cycle characteristics of porcine fetal fibroblast ce lls cultured under a variety of cell cycle-arresting treatments. This was a chieved by using flour cytometry to simultaneously measure cellular DNA and protein content, enabling the calculation of percentages of cells in CO, G 1, S, and G2+M phases of the cell cycle. Cultures that were serum starved f or 5 days contained higher (p < 0.05) percentages of G0+G1 (87.5 +/- 0.7) a nd G0 cells alone (48.3 +/- 9.7) compared with rapidly cycling cultures (G0 +G1: 74.1 +/- 3.0; G0: 2.8 +/- 1.2). Growth to confluency increased (p < 0. 05) G0+G1 percentages (85.1 +/- 2.8) but did not increase GO percentages (6 .0 +/- 5.3) compared to those in cycling cultures. Separate assessment of s mall-, medium-, and large-sized cells showed that as the cell size decrease d from large to small, percentages of cells in G0+G1 and GO alone increased (p < 0.05). we found 95.2 +/- 0.3% and 72.2 +/- 12.0% of small serum-starv ed cells in G0+G1 and GO alone, respectively. Cultures were also treated wi th cell cycle inhibitors. Treatment with dimethyl sulfoxide (1%) or colchic ine (0.5 mu M) increased percentages of cells in CO (24.8 +/- 20.0) or G2+M (37.4 +/- 4.6), respectively. However, cells were only slightly responsive to mimosine treatment. A more complete understanding of the cell cycle of donor cells should lead to improvements in the efficiency of nuclear transf er procedures.