Da. Kass et al., Improved left ventricular mechanics from acute VDD pacing in patients withdilated cardiomyopathy and ventricular conduction delay, CIRCULATION, 99(12), 1999, pp. 1567-1573
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Background-Ventricular pacing can improve hemodynamics in heart failure pat
ients, but direct effects on left ventricular (LV) function from varying pa
cing site and atrioventricular (AV) delay remain unknown. We hypothesized t
hat the magnitude and location of basal intraventricular conduction delay c
ritically influences pacing responses and that single-site pacing in the de
lay-activated region yields similar or better responses to biventricular pa
cing.
Methods and Results-Aortic and LV pressures were measured in 18 heart failu
re patients (mean+/-SD: LV ejection fraction, 19+/-7%; LV end-diastolic pre
ssure, 25+/-8 mm Hg; QRS duration, 157+/-36 ms). Data under normal sinus rh
ythm were compared with ventricular pacing (VDD) at varying sites and AV de
lays (randomized order). Right ventricular (RV) apical or midseptal pacing
had negligible contractile/systolic effects. However, LV free-wall pacing r
aised dP/dt(max) by 23.7+/-19.0% and pulse pressure by 18.0+/-18.4% (P<0.01
). Biventricular pacing yielded less change (+12.8+/-9.3% in dP/dt(max), P<
0.05 versus LV). Pressure-volume analysis performed in 11 patients consiste
ntly revealed minimal changes with RV pacing but increased stroke work and
lower end-systolic volumes with LV pacing. Optimal AV intervals averaged 12
5+/-49 ms, and within this range, AV delay had less influence on LV functio
n than pacing site. Basal QRS duration positively con-elated with %Delta dP
/dt(max) (P<0.005), but pacing efficacy was not associated with QRS narrowi
ng. Conduction delay pattern generally predicted pacing sites with most eff
ect.
Conclusions-VDD pacing acutely enhances contractile function in heart failu
re patients with intraventricular conduction delay. Single-site pacing at t
he site of greatest delay achieves similar of greater benefits to biventric
ular pacing in such patients. These data clarify pacing-effect mechanisms a
nd should help in candidate identification for future studies.