Clinical and electrophysiological assessment of inferior alveolar nerve function after lateral nerve transposition

Citation
Pf. Nocini et al., Clinical and electrophysiological assessment of inferior alveolar nerve function after lateral nerve transposition, CLIN OR IMP, 10(2), 1999, pp. 120-130
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry/Oral Surgery & Medicine
Journal title
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
ISSN journal
09057161 → ACNP
Volume
10
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
120 - 130
Database
ISI
SICI code
0905-7161(199904)10:2<120:CAEAOI>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) transposition surgery may cause some degree o f sensory impairment. Accurate and reproducible tests are mandatory to asse ss IAN conduction capacity following nerve transposition. In this study sub jective (heat, pain and tactile-discriminative tests) and objective (electr ophysiological) assessments were performed in 10 patients receiving IAN tra nsposition (bilaterally in 8 cases) in order to evaluate any impairment of the involved nerves one year post-operatively. All patients reported a ting ling, well-tolerated sensation in the areas supplied by the mental nerve wi th no anaesthesia or burning paresthesia. Tactile discrimination was affect ed the most (all but 1 patient). No action potential was recorded in 4 pati ents' sides (23.5%); 12 sides showed a decreased nerve conduction velocity (NCV) (70.5%) and 1 side normal NCV values (6%). There was no significant d ifference in NCV decrease between partial and total transposition sides, if examined separately. Nerve conduction findings were related 2-point discri mination scores, but not to changes in pain and heat sensitivity. These fin dings show that lateral nerve transposition, though resulting in a high per centage of minor LAN injuries, as determined by electrophysiological testin g, provides a viable surgical procedure to allow implant placement in the p osterior mandible without causing severe sensory complaints. Considering et hical and forensic implications, patients should be fully informed that a c ertain degree of nerve injury might be expected to occur from the procedure . Electrophysiological evaluation is a reliable way to assess the degree of IAN dysfunction, especially if combined with a clinical examination. Intra operative monitoring of IAN conduction might help identify the pathogenetic mechanisms of nerve injury and the surgical steps that are most likely to harm nerve integrity.