We show that the Cepheid PL relation is affected by a Malmquist type bias,
that of so-called population incompleteness. Its calculated slope appears s
hallower than the true one because of the cut-off in apparent magnitude due
to the instrumental limiting magnitude. Furthermore, the use of the PL rel
ation, even with the comet slope, leads to significant underestimation of d
istances which is not negligible. A correction for this bias is difficult a
s long as the completeness of the sample is not perfectly well established.
(C) Academie des sciences/Elsevier, Paris.