The Available Bit Rate (ABR) service has been shown to enable persistent, g
reedy data sources to efficiently utilize ATM network resources. However, t
he throughput for bursty TCP over ABR data traffic in the presence of inter
fering traffic may not be as good as for persistent ABR sources without int
erfering traffic. This paper shows that in a comparison of rate based ABR s
chemes (EPRCA and ERICA) and a credit based ABR scheme (QFC), QFC performan
ce is significantly better than rate based ABR schemes for bursty data traf
fic with bursty interfering traffic. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rig
hts reserved.