Glycaemic control in NIDDM patients and its relation to inpatient care utilisation, short-term sick-leave and premature retirement

Citation
J. Olsson et al., Glycaemic control in NIDDM patients and its relation to inpatient care utilisation, short-term sick-leave and premature retirement, DIABET NUTR, 11(4), 1998, pp. 232-236
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology, Metabolism & Nutrition","Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
DIABETES NUTRITION & METABOLISM
ISSN journal
03943402 → ACNP
Volume
11
Issue
4
Year of publication
1998
Pages
232 - 236
Database
ISI
SICI code
0394-3402(199808)11:4<232:GCINPA>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between glycaemic cont rol, on the one hand, and short-term sick-leave, premature retirement and i npatient care requirement, on the other in patients with non-insulin depend ent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), A cross-sectional study model was applied to NIDDM patients from a Swedish primary health care centre, Inpatient care a nd short-term sick-leave were recorded as cumulative incidence in 1991, Pre valence of premature retirement was recorded at 31 December 1991, Clinical information on glycaemic control, i.e., HbA(1c) levels, blood pressure, and body weight were obtained from a computerised medical record system, All H bA(1c) determinations were performed at the same laboratory using an HPLC-m ethod. HbA(1c) level was significantly higher (7.8 % vs 6.8%) in patients w ho utilised inpatient care than in those who did not. No association with t he HbA(1c) level was found for sick-leave or premature retirement. Therefor e it seems reasonable to assume that glycaemic control is more predictive o f clinical complications in elderly NIDDM patients than in younger ones. Ho wever, as vascular complications from poor glycaemic control develop slowly and gradually, poor glycaemic control even in younger patients may eventua lly result in an increased need of impatient care, Accordingly, the lack of relationship between HbA(1c) and risks of premature retirement and short-t erm sick-leave in patients younger than 65 should not be used as an excuse for less aggressive treatment of younger NIDDM patients.