Screening for prostate cancer has been advocated by a number of organisatio
ns largely because there is good evidence that administration of the test f
or prostate specific antigen (PSA) results in the detection of cancers at a
n early stage. However, the mere fact that a cancer can be detected earlier
in its natural history by screening is no guarantee that benefit will foll
ow. Further, screening for prostate cancer can substantially impair the qua
lity of life of those with detected and treated cancer, that would not othe
rwise have reduced Life expectancy. The only established mechanism to evalu
ate the efficacy of screening is the randomised controlled trial. In this p
aper we review the trials contributing to our collaboration, the advantages
that will flow from them, and the reasons why decisions on the introductio
n of population-based screening for prostate cancer cannot be made before t
hese trials have come to fruition. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All right
s reserved.