J. Rudolf et al., Stroke following internal carotid artery occlusion a contra-indication forintravenous thrombolysis?, EUR J NEUR, 6(1), 1999, pp. 51-55
Between March 1996 and December 1997, 15 consecutive patients with carotid
artery occlusion diagnosed with duplex sonography were treated with intrave
nous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA), following a protocol
similar to that of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and St
roke (NINDS) study. On the basis of ultrasound findings, sis of the 15 pati
ents had internal carotid artery dissection (ICD), and the remaining nine h
ad atherothrombotic internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion. No relevant ha
emorrhagic complications were observed after rt-Prl treatment of ICA occlus
ion. Excellent late functional outcome was observed in three of the 15 pati
ents with ICA occlusion, moderate and poor outcome in four patients. Four p
atients died, and mortality was related to stroke severity upon admission.
A good outcome seemed to be more likely in the small group of patients with
ICD, than in the patients suffering atherothrombotic ICA occlusion.
As the results of rt-PA treatment in this case series are by no means devas
tating, our data do not corroborate the hypothesis that patients with acute
ischemic stroke following ICA occlusion should a priori be excluded from i
ntravenous thrombolysis. The possible benefit of rt-PA treatment in stroke
following acute or chronic ICA occlusion should be assessed in a larger pro
spective trial, for which this case series might serve as a pilot study. Eu
r J Neurol 6:51-55 (C) 1999 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.