There are many similarities among mammalian species in how ecological facto
rs affect their reproductive potential and individual life histories. One o
f the most important limiting factors is the availability of sufficient res
ources to partition among essential growth, maintenance, and eventual repro
duction.(1-3) How each mammal juggles these constraints constitutes its uni
que life history and determines its success as a species. Yet, as Hill and
Hurtado(4) recently argued, life-history analyses are rarely applied to hum
an reproduction. In fact, despite the demonstrated significance of adequate
nutrition for reproductive performance among most mammalian species that h
ave been studied,(1,3,5) many demographers, and even some biological anthro
pologists, have resisted the idea that humans, except under extreme famine
conditions, might be subject to the same kinds of nutritional constraints t
hat affect other mammals (6-9).