Sv. Adamovich et al., Pointing in 3D space to remembered targets - II: Effects of movement speedtoward kinesthetically defined targets, EXP BRAIN R, 125(2), 1999, pp. 200-210
The accuracy of visually guided pointing movements decreases with speed. We
have shown that for movements to a visually defined remembered target, the
variability of the final arm endpoint position does not depend on movement
speed. We put forward a hypothesis that this observation can be explained
by suggesting that movements directed at remembered targets are produced wi
thout ongoing corrections. In the present study, this hypothesis was tested
for pointing movements in 3D space to kinesthetically defined remembered t
argets. Passive versus active acquisition of kinesthetic information was co
ntrasted. Pointing errors, movement kinematics, and joint-angle coordinatio
n were analyzed. The movements were performed at a slow speed (average peak
tangential velocity of about 1.2 m/s) and at a fast speed (2.7 m/s), No vi
sual feedback was allowed during the target presentation or the movement. V
ariability in the final position of the arm endpoint did not increase with
speed in either the active or the passive condition. Variability in the fin
al values of the arm-orientation angles determining the position of the for
earm and of the upper arm in space was also speed invariant. This invarianc
e occurred despite the fact that angular velocities increased by a factor o
f two for all the angles involved. The speed-invariant variability supports
the hypothesis that there is an absence of ongoing corrections for movemen
ts to remembered targets: in the case of a slower movement, where there is
more time for movement correction, the final arm endpoint variability did n
ot decrease. In contrast to variability in the final endpoint position, the
variability in the peak tangential acceleration increased significantly wi
th movement speed. This may imply that the nervous system adopts one of two
strategies: either the final endpoint position is not encoded in terms of
muscle torques or there is a special on-line mechanism that adjusts: moveme
nt deceleration according to the muscle-torque variability at the initial s
tage of the movement. The final endpoint position was on average farther fr
om the shoulder than the target. Constant radial-distance errors were speed
dependent in both the active and the passive conditions. In the fast speed
conditions, the radial distance overshoots of the targets increased. This
increase in radial-distance overshoot with movement speed can be explained
by the hypothesis that the final arm position is not predetermined in these
experimental conditions, but is defined during the movement by a Feedforwa
rd or feedback mechanism with an internal delay.