In this paper I argue that in order to challenge the marginalisation o
f lesbians, gay men, and other sexual dissidents within the discipline
, we need to pay more attention to how geography has been studied. I c
onsider how different theoretical approaches to the subject have treat
ed sexual dissidence. While positivism has been particularly guilty of
ignoring the interests of lesbians and gay men, the new cultural geog
raphy, and feminist geography, though enabling a limited amount of wor
k on the geography of lesbians and gay men, may also reproduce heteros
exism. This raises the question of which methodological and epistemolo
gical frameworks work best in promoting the interests of sexual dissid
ents within the discipline, and the academy more generally. Last I con
sider the material components of sexual dissident identity and how the
se impact upon the production of geographical knowledge.