BACKGROUND/AIMS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is now the treatment of choic
e for symptomatic gallstone diseases. However, besides its great benefits,
perhaps the most disappointing complication of this operation is missed mal
ignancies. In this study, patients who had missed malignancies that were di
agnosed shortly after laparoscopic cholecystectomy were studied. We aim to
find out the cause of missed and delayed diagnosis.
METHODOLOGY: Between 1991 and June 1997, 9 patients undergoing laparoscopic
cholecystectomy, which had been performed elsewhere 2-9 months earlier, an
d having had missed malignancy were included in this study. A diagnostic su
rvey was collected from the medical records, questionnaires, and a semiolog
ical analysis. All laboratory data and physical findings, before and after
laparoscopic cholecystectomy, were recorded. Follow-up data were obtained t
hrough a telephone questionnaire.
RESULTS: Of these 9 patients, 6 had colorectal carcinoma and 3 had pancreas
carcinoma. All patients complained of recent atypical pain at the time of
laparoscopic cholecystectomy, except for 1 patient who had no symptomatic r
egression.
CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to make a careful semiological, physical and l
aboratory analysis of patients with cholelithiasis before especially laparo
scopic cholecystectomy. Elderly patients, atypical biliary pain and associa
ted symptoms must draw attention to the possibility malignancy.