The diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile in antibiotic-associated diarrhea

Citation
L. Gorenek et al., The diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile in antibiotic-associated diarrhea, HEP-GASTRO, 46(25), 1999, pp. 343-348
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenerology and Hepatology","da verificare
Journal title
HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY
ISSN journal
01726390 → ACNP
Volume
46
Issue
25
Year of publication
1999
Pages
343 - 348
Database
ISI
SICI code
0172-6390(199901/02)46:25<343:TDATOC>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study was initiated to evaluate the role of C. diffic ile in diarrhea associated with the use of antibiotics, to determine which antibiotics are most often responsible, to characterize the response to sev eral different treatment regimens, and to define the relapse rate as seen i n a large teaching hospital in Turkey. METHODOLOGY: Three different patient groups were studied. The first group c onsisted of 154 individuals with antibiotic-associated diarrhea. The stools of all 154 cases were cultured on cycleserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar (C C FA). If any bacteria grew out, they were identified specifically as C. diff icile using a commercially available latex agglutination kit specific for b acterial antigens of C. difficile (MicroScreen C. difficile Latex Slide Tes t; Merica Diagnostic Limited, Guilford, England). The presence of toxin-A ( CDTA) was determined using a MicroScreen CDTA Enzyme Immunoassay kit. RESULTS: The stools of 31 of these patients grew out enteric pathogens. Twe nty-eight of these 31 were CCFA positive. Three different drug regimens (Or nidazole, Ornidazole + Cholestyramine, and Vancomycin) were used to treat t hese 28 C. difficile positive cases. The second group consisted of 37 hospi talized patients who had been in hospital for more than 30 days without any gastrointestinal symptoms. This group was used to identify the in-hospital carrier rate for C. difficile. Stools from these 37 cases were cultured on CCFA and were analyzed for the presence of CDTA by ELA. Colonization with C. difficile was detected in 4 cases. The third group consisted of 40 healt hy subjects who served as a population-based control group. The stools obta ined from these 40 cases were cultured on CCFA and analyzed for CDTA as wer e the stools for the other 2 groups. None were CDTA positive. One case was positive for the presence of non-toxigenic C. difficile. CONCLUSIONS: It can be concluded from these data that, in Turkey, C. diffic ile is responsible for 20% of antibiotic-associated diarrheas. Lincomycin, Azithromycin and Ampicillin were most often associated with the development of antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Ornidazole and Vancomycin were effectiv e agents for C. difficile-associated diarrhea with the latter agent being a ssociated with no relapses.