BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study is to clarify the significance of a
major hepatectomy for small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs).
METHODOLOGY: Seventy-eight patients with solitary HCC measuring less than 3
cm in diameter, whose liver function was considered sufficient to tolerate
a right hepatic lobectomy, were classified into 2 groups consisting of: a m
ajor group (n=18), who underwent a major hepatectomy (2 segments or more);
and, a minor group (n=60), who underwent a hepatectomy including one segmen
t or less. The early post-operative outcome and the long-term outcomes, com
prising patient survival as well as disease-free survival, were compared. I
n addition, the post-operative long-term changes in liver function tests an
d esophageal variceal occurrence were also compared.
RESULTS: In the post-operative mortality and morbidity, no significant diff
erences were found between the 2 groups. However, 1 patient in the major gr
oup unexpectedly died of liver failure 6 months after operation. No signifi
cant difference was observed in patient survival and disease-free survival.
The platelet count in the major group tended to decline more rapidly than
that in the minor group. Furthermore, 1 patient in the major group demonstr
ated risky esophageal varices 29 months after operation, which had to be tr
eated by endoscopic injection sclerotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the above findings, a major hepatectomy is therefore
not recommended for patients with solitary small HCC measuring 3cm or less
in diameter.