True pedigree errors more frequent than apparent errors for single nucleotide polymorphisms

Citation
D. Gordon et al., True pedigree errors more frequent than apparent errors for single nucleotide polymorphisms, HUMAN HERED, 49(2), 1999, pp. 65-70
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Molecular Biology & Genetics
Journal title
HUMAN HEREDITY
ISSN journal
00015652 → ACNP
Volume
49
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
65 - 70
Database
ISI
SICI code
0001-5652(1999)49:2<65:TPEMFT>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are currently being developed for us e in disequilibrium analyses. These SNPs consist of two alleles with varyin g degrees of polymorphism. A natural design for use with SNPs is the 'haplo type relative risk' sampling design in which a father, mother, and child ar e typed at an SNP locus. Given such a trio of genotypes, we ask: what is th e probability that a pedigree error (a change from one allele to the other) at an SNP locus will be detected using only Mender's laws as a check? We c alculate the probability of detecting such errors for a hypothetical SNP lo cus with varying degrees of polymorphism and for various true error rates. For the sets of allele frequencies considered, we find that the detection r ates range between 25 and 30%, the detection rate being lowest when the two alleles have equal frequencies and the highest when one allele has a frequ ency of 10%. Based on this detection rate, we determine that the true error rate is roughly 3.3-4 times that of the apparent error rate at an SNP locu s. The greatest discrepancy between true and apparent error rates occurs wh en allele frequencies are equal.