Cloud liquid water path (LWP) retrievals from the Special Sensor Microwave/
Imager (SSM/I) and surface microwave radiometers are compared over land to
assess the errors in selected satellite methods, These techniques require s
urface emissivity composites created from SSM/I and infrared (IR) data. Two
different physical methods are tested: a single-channel (SC) approach (eit
her 85.5-GHz channel); and a normalized polarization difference (NPD) appro
ach (37 or 85.5 GHz). Comparisons were made at four sites in Oklahoma and K
ansas over an 11-month period.
The 85.5-GHz NPD method was the most accurate and robust under most conditi
ons. An error analysis shows that the method's random errors are dominated
by uncertainties in the surface emissivity and instrument noise. Since the
SC method is more prone to systematic errors (such as surface emissivity er
rors caused by rain events), it initially compared poorly to the ground obs
ervations. After filtering for rain events, the comparisons improved. Overa
ll, the root mean square (rms) errors ranged from 0.12 to 0.14 kg m(-2), su
ggesting these methods can provide, at best, three categories of cloud LWP,
It is anticipated that the techniques and strategies developed in this stu
dy, and prior related studies, to analyze passive microwave data will be re
quisite for maximizing the information content of future instruments.