Although most analyses of amnesia have focused on the loss of explicit
declarative and episodic memories following hippocampal-region damage
, considerable insights into amnesia can also be realised by studying
hippocampal function in simple procedural, or habit-based, associative
learning tasks. Although many simple forms of associative learning ar
e unimpaired by hippocampal damage, more complex tasks which require s
ensitivity to unreinforced stimuli, configurations of multiple stimuli
, or contextual information are impaired by hippocampal damage. In sev
eral recent papers we have developed a computational theory of hippoca
mpal function which argues that this brain region plays a critical rol
e in the formation of new stimulus representations during learning (Gl
uck & Myers, 1993, 1995; Myers & Gluck, 1996; Myers, Gluck, & Granger,
1995). We have applied this theory to a broad range of empirical data
from studies of classical conditioning in both intact and hippocampal
-lesioned animals, and the model correctly accounts for these data. Th
e classical conditioning paradigm can be adapted for use in humans, an
d similar results for acquisition are obtained in both normal and hipp
ocampal-damaged humans. More recently, we have begun to address an imp
ortant set of category learning studies in both normals and hippocampa
l-damaged amnesics. This work integrates experimental studies of amnes
ic category learning (Knowlton, Squire, & Gluck, 1994) with theoretica
l accounts of associative learning, and builds on previously establish
ed behavioural correspondences between animal conditioning and human c
ategory learning (Gluck & Bower, 1988a). Our work to date illustrates
some initial progress towards a more integrative understanding of hipp
ocampal function in both animal and human learning, which may be usefu
l in guiding further empirical and theoretical research in human memor
y and amnesia.