Social cognitive predictors of nutritional rise in rural elderly adults

Citation
Hm. Hendy et al., Social cognitive predictors of nutritional rise in rural elderly adults, INT J AGING, 47(4), 1998, pp. 299-327
Citations number
107
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGING & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
ISSN journal
00914150 → ACNP
Volume
47
Issue
4
Year of publication
1998
Pages
299 - 327
Database
ISI
SICI code
0091-4150(1998)47:4<299:SCPONR>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
According to Social Cognitive Theory (Bandura, 1997), nutritional risk woul d be predicted by perceptions of nutrition efficacy, which in turn would be predicted from four sources: modeling, verbal support, physiological condi tions, and nutrition habits. In telephone interviews with 154 rural elderly adults (44 men, 110 women; mean age = 74.4 years), nutritional risk was me asured with Nutritional Risk Index (NRI), Nutritional Screening Initiative (NSI), and seven-high-risk-nutrients consumed less than 50 percent of RDA ( Diet Plus Analysis). Nutrition-efficacy was measured with a new twenty-five -item scale of Perceived Nutrition Barriers (PNB). Sources of nutrition-eff icacy included: mealtime modeling-shared meals, household size; verbal supp ort-people talk to each day, hours talked, number of confidants; physiologi cal conditions that may affect nutrition-age, body mass, medications, disab ility, negative affect, and nutrition habits-daily food variety, use of mea l services. Path analysis was performed with each measure of nutritional ri sk (NRI, NSI, 7-high-risk-nutrients) as a criterion variable, nutrition-eff icacy (PNB) as a possible mediating variable, and sources of nutrition-effi cacy as predictor variables. Social Cognitive variables accounted for 58 pe rcent of variance in NRI, 49 percent of variance in NSI, and 29 percent of variance in seven-high-risk-nutrients. Nutritional risk was directly predic ted by large households, few shared meals, few confidants, high body mass, many medications, and few daily foods; it was indirectly predicted (via PNB ) by high levels of negative affect. Perceived Nutrition Barriers (PNB) mos t often mentioned were food cost, eating alone, food tastelessness, transpo rtation to the store, and chewing difficulty.