Purpose: Pulsed dose rate (PDR) treatment is a new approach that associates
the physical advantages of high-dose-rate (HDR) technology with the potent
ial radiobiological advantages of low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy. This r
etrospective study analyzes the feasibility, toxicity, and preliminary onco
logic results in a series of 43 patients treated with PDR interstitial brac
hytherapy.
Methods and Materials: Twenty-four patients with pelvic, 17 patients with h
ead and neck, and 2 patients with breast cancers were treated. Twenty-eight
patients had primary and 15 recurrent tumors; 14 had received prior extern
al irradiation to the same site. The doses per pulse at the prescription is
odose were 0.4-1 Gy (median 0.5 Gy), delivered using a single cable-driven
0.3-1.0 Ci 192-iridium source (PDR Nucletron Micro-Selectron).
Results: The median treated volumes (at the prescribed isodose) were 28 cc
for pelvic, 8.33 cc for head and neck, and 40 cc for breast malignancies. O
f 14,499 source and 14,499 dummy source transfer procedures, 3 technical ma
chine failure events were observed (0.02%). Grade 3 acute toxicities were s
een in 5/43 patients (4 oral stomatitis, 1 vaginal mucositis) and grade 4 a
cute toxicity in one patient (rectovaginal fistula). Grade 3-4 late complic
ations were observed in 4/41 (9.8%) patients: 1 pubic fracture, I rectovagi
nal fistula, 1 vesicovaginal fistula and 1 local necrosis. With a median fo
llow-up of 18 months, 10/41 patients progressed locoregionally (6 pelvic, 4
head and neck), 3 developed local recurrence and distant metastasis (3 pel
vic), 3 only distant metastasis (2 pelvic, 1 head and neck). Two patients a
re lost to follow-up.
Conclusion: PDR interstitial brachytherapy for pelvic, head and neck, and b
reast malignancies is feasible and the acute and late toxicities seem accep
table. Although the physical advantages of PDR are clear, further follow-up
is required to determine how results compare with those obtained with stan
dard LDR brachytherapy. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.