B. Vikram et al., The relationship between dose heterogeneity ("hot" spots) and complications following high-dose rate brachytherapy, INT J RAD O, 43(5), 1999, pp. 983-987
Citations number
8
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
Purpose: It is generally believed that "hot" spots should be avoided in rad
iotherapy because they lead to complications. Dose homogeneity within the t
arget volume is much more difficult to achieve during brachytherapy than du
ring external beam irradiation, and implants are rarely geometrically perfe
ct. To not underdose some parts of the target volume, therefore, it may be
necessary to accept hot spots in other parts of the target volumes, but it
is not at all clear from the literature how much dose heterogeneity should
be considered excessive. We undertook this study in an effort to determine
just how high a dose to a hot spot is associated with clinically significan
t complications.
Methods and Materials: We studied 40 patients treated by high-dose rate bra
chytherapy with or without external irradiation. For each patient, we calcu
lated the minimum dose to the "hottest" 1 cubic centimeter (cc) volume (Dma
x1) and, for 18 patients, the minimum dose to the hottest 10 cc volume (Dma
x10) as well.
Results: Considerable dose heterogeneity existed within the target volume.
The Dmax1 ranged from 150-2000% (median 320%) of the minimum target dose (M
TD). The median MTD/fraction was 2.50 Gy (range 1.50-25.00), and the median
Dmax1/fraction was 10.00 Gy (range 3.75-150.00). The median Dmax1 from the
entire course of brachytherapy was 75.00 Gy (range 25.00-550.00). Adding t
he doses from planned external irradiation, plus any prior irradiation to t
he same area, the median total Dmax1 was 112.50 Gy (range 30.00-580.00), ye
t the incidence of complications, even among those in the highest quartile
of this dose range, was not greater than the lowest quartile. The total med
ian Dmax10 was 85.00 Gy (range 32.00-130.00), but the incidence of complica
tions was, again, similar whether the dose was in the lower or the upper ha
lf of this range (32.00-85.00 Gy, or 86.00-130.00 Gy, respectively).
Conclusions: We had expected to find that the patients with the highest Dma
x1 and/or Dmax10 would be the ones most likely to suffer complications, but
the results did not support this hypothesis. Thus, dose heterogeneity, wit
hin the scope of our study, turned out to be rather unimportant with regard
to complications. This finding contradicts the conventional wisdom and sug
gests that concerns about hot spots need not preclude optimization to ensur
e adequate dosage to all parts of the target volume. (C) 1999 Elsevier Scie
nce Inc.