Outcomes in breast cancer patients relative to margin status after treatment with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy: The University of Pennsylvania experience

Citation
Me. Peterson et al., Outcomes in breast cancer patients relative to margin status after treatment with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy: The University of Pennsylvania experience, INT J RAD O, 43(5), 1999, pp. 1029-1035
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
ISSN journal
03603016 → ACNP
Volume
43
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1029 - 1035
Database
ISI
SICI code
0360-3016(19990315)43:5<1029:OIBCPR>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the significance of final microscopic resection margin status on treatment outcomes in women with early breast cancer who are tre ated with breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation. Methods and Materials: An analysis was performed of 1021 consecutive women with clinical Stage I or II invasive carcinoma of the breast treated with b reast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation. Complete gross excision of tumor was performed in all cases, and an axillary staging proce dure was performed to determine pathologic axillary lymph node status. The 1021 patients were divided into four groups based on the final microscopic margin from the tumor excision or from the re-excision if performed. These four groups were: (a) 518 patients with negative margins; (b) 124 patients with focally positive margins; (c) 96 patients with focally close margins ( less than or equal to 2 mm); and (d) 283 patients with unknown margins. Results: Local failure was not significantly different in patients with neg ative, focally positive, focally close or unknown final pathologic margins of resection at 8 years (8% vs. 10% vs. 17% vs. 16%, respectively, p = 0.21 ). The 8-year outcome also was not different among the four groups for over all survival (86% vs. 83% vs. 88% vs. 81%, respectively, p = 0.13), cause-s pecific survival (89% vs. 86% vs. 88% vs. 83%, respectively, p = 0.14), no evidence of disease survival (81% vs. 73% vs. 86% vs. 77%, respectively, p = 0.09), and freedom from distant metastases (85% vs. 75% vs. 86% vs. 79%, respectively, p = 0.08). Conclusion: These results demonstrate that selected patients with focally p ositive or focally close microscopic resection margins can be treated with breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation with 8-year loc al control rates and survival rates that are similar to those seen in breas t-conservation patients with negative or unknown final resection margins. ( C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.