The best arsenic treatment technique for a given utility will depend on ars
enic concentration and species in source water, other constituents in the w
ater, existing treatment processes, treatment costs, and handling of residu
als. To evaluate these issues a national survey investigated arsenic occurr
ence and speciation in US drinking, water sources. in general, total arseni
c concentration was higher in groundwater than in surface water supplies. P
articulate arsenic was more abundant than previously and more arsenate than
arsenite was present. The cost arsenic: treatment increased in the followi
ng order: modified conventional treatment << activated alumina or anion exc
hange < reverse osmosis. Nevertheless, the most cost-effective treatment mi
ght not be best, because secondary treatment benefits and residuals handlin
g should also be taken into account.