We identify three types of Information from bank examinations-"auditing inf
ormation" from verifying the honesty and accuracy of the bank's books, ''re
gulatory discipline information'' about the treatment of the bank by regula
tors, and "private information" about bank condition. We estimate these inf
ormation effects by comparing the cumulative abnormal market returns associ
ated with examinations in which the CAMEL rating remained unchanged, improv
ed, and worsened. All three information effects are found to be greater for
banks entering the examination process with unsatisfactory ratings from pr
ior examinations. The only consistently strong effect found is that examina
tion downgrades appear to reveal unfavorable private information about bank
condition. The evidence also suggests that the information may reach the m
arket in part through loan quality data released in quarterly financial sta
tements.