Combination therapy with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil following cardiac transplantation: Importance of mycophenolic acid therapeutic drug monitoring
Bm. Meiser et al., Combination therapy with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil following cardiac transplantation: Importance of mycophenolic acid therapeutic drug monitoring, J HEART LUN, 18(2), 1999, pp. 143-149
Background: Interest has recently been expressed in tacrolimus and mycophen
olate mofetil (MMF), two potent immunosuppressants, for a variety of transp
lant indications. The efficacy of this combination was assessed as primary
therapy following cardiac transplantation.
Methods: Forty-five patients were enrolled; 15 into Phase I and 30 to Phase
II of the study. Intravenous tacrolimus was administered for 2-3 days to a
ll patients prior to conversion to oral therapy; target blood concentration
s were 10-15 ng/mL. Treatment also consisted of steroids and MMF. During Ph
ase I, a fixed 2 g/day dose of MMF was given whilst doses were adjusted acc
ording to mycophenolic acid (MPA) plasma levels during Phase II (target ran
ge 2.5-4.5 mu g/mL). Mean follow-up was 696 +/- 62 days and 436 +/- 88 days
for Phases I and II, respectively.
Results: Phase I: Patient survival was 100%. Rejection was diagnosed in 66.
7% of patients (mean number of episodes per patient 1.33 +/- 1.18). Retrosp
ective analyses indicated that whereas mean MPA plasma levels >3.0 mu g/mL
were not associated with rejection, no correlation was found with tacrolimu
s blood concentrations. Phase II: A survival rate of 96.7% was evident, one
patient having died from aspergillosis. Diagnoses of rejection were made i
n 10.0% of patients (0.10 +/- 0.31 episodes per patient) and confounding fa
ctors were present in all 3 cases. MPA trough levels were 1.0 +/- 0.3 mu g/
mL at this time. Resolution was apparent following pulse steroid therapy. S
teroids were successfully withdrawn from all patients who completed 6 month
s' treatment.
Conclusions: Combination therapy with tacrolimus and MMF is associated with
suppression of acute myocardial rejection; however, this is dependent upon
routine therapeutic drug monitoring.