Discourses constructed to represent lesbians and gay men in the public sphe
re generate an essentialist identity which is both necessary and damaging.
Legislative debate illustrates the production of a constrictive and homogen
eous identity rejected by many gay/lesbian scholars and activists. Discussi
on of the rhetorical power of identity claims has produced alternative stan
ces toward variant sexuality. This discussion can be advanced by challengin
g dominant constructions of civil rights and the public sphere.