T. Hedner et A. Himmelmann, The efficacy and tolerance of one or two daily doses of eprosartan in essential hypertension, J HYPERTENS, 17(1), 1999, pp. 129-136
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Objective The primary objective of this double-blind, parallel-group, place
bo-controlled, multicentre study was to compare the antihypertensive effica
cy of one versus two daily doses of eprosartan, a novel nonbiphenyl, nontet
razole angiotensin II receptor antagonist, in 243 patients with mild to mod
erate hypertension (sitting diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal
to 95 to less than or equal to 114 mmHg).
Patients and methods The patients were randomized to titrated doses of epro
sartan at 400-800 mg once a day, eprosartan at 200-400 mg twice a day, or p
lacebo, with the incremental dose titrated over a 9-week period. Patients r
eaching target blood pressure (sitting diastolic blood pressure of less tha
n or equal to 90 mmHg) continued the fixed-dose treatment for 4 weeks. The
primary efficacy measure was the mean change in trough sitting diastolic bl
ood pressure from baseline to the study endpoint, determined on an intent-t
o-treat basis.
Results By the end of the study, eprosartan had significantly reduced mean
trough sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressure relative to baseline a
nd to placebo. The mean +/- SD change from baseline in diastolic pressure w
as -9 +/- 8.4 mmHg for the single daily dose, -9 +/- 8.5 mmHg for two doses
a day and -4 +/- 8.1 mmHg for placebo (P < 0.0001 versus placebo for both
eprosartan regimens). Similarly, both eprosartan regimens significantly red
uced mean trough standing systolic and diastolic blood pressure. At the end
of the study, the response rate in the single daily dose group (46.8%) was
significantly higher than in the placebo group (25.6%). There were no sign
ificant differences between the treatment groups in the number of patients
whose blood pressure responded to treatment; 41.7% of those taking eprosart
an once a day and 44.4% of those taking eprosartan twice a day, and who res
ponded to treatment, were maintained on their original starting doses. The
total daily dose required to achieve target blood pressure was comparable,
whether eprosartan was administered once or twice a day. Both eprosartan re
gimens were well tolerated and the incidence of adverse events with eprosar
tan was similar to that of placebo.
Conclusions These results demonstrate that there was no significant differe
nce in antihypertensive efficacy or tolerance between eprosartan taken in o
ne or in two daily doses. Both dosing regimens provided significant and cli
nically meaningful reductions in blood pressure that were superior to place
bo. Eprosartan in a single daily dose was shown to be an effective antihype
rtensive agent. Because of the good adverse-effect profile and the simplici
ty of a single daily dose, eprosartan has the potential to improve patient
compliance. J Hypertens 1999, 17:129-136 (C) Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.