The mechanism by which TCR antagonists interfere with T cell activation is
unclear. One popular hypothesis is that incomplete early signaling events i
nduced by these ligands dominantly inhibit the T cell's ability to respond
to a copresented agonist ligand. Here,ve test this "dominant negative" sign
al hypothesis by studying T cells expressing two distinct MHC class I-restr
icted TCRs (2C and OT-I), Although responses through each TCR can be effici
ently inhibited by their specific antagonists, we found no evidence for "cr
oss-antagonism" in which an antagonist for receptor "A" blocks responses th
rough receptor "B," Such inhibition would have been expected were the domin
ant negative signaling hypothesis correct, and alternative models for TCR a
ntagonism are discussed.