Erosion and sedimentation data from research watersheds in the Silver Creek
Study Area in central Idaho were used to test the prediction of logging ro
ad erosion using the R1-R4 sediment yield model, and sediment delivery usin
g the "BOISED" sediment yield prediction model. Three small watersheds were
instrumented and monitored such that erosion from newly constructed roads
and sediment delivery to the mouths of the watersheds could be measured for
four years following road construction. The errors for annual surface eros
ion predictions for the two standard road tests ranged from +31.2 t/ha/yr (
+15 percent) to -30.3 t/ha/yr (-63 percent) with an average of zero t/ha/yr
and a standard deviation of the differences of 18.7 t/ha/yr. The annual pr
ediction errors for the three watershed scale tests had a greater range fro
m -40.8 t/ha/yr (-70 percent) to +65.3 t/ha/yr (+38 percent) with a mean of
-1.9 t/ha/yr and a standard deviation of the differences of 25.2 t/ha/yr.
Sediment yields predicted by BOISED (watershed scale tests) were consistent
ly greater (average of 2.5 times) than measured sediment yields. Hillslope
sediment delivery coefficients in BOISED appear to be overly conservative t
o account for average site conditions and road locations, and thus over-pre
dict sediment delivery. Mass erosion predictions from BOISED appear to pred
ict volume well (465 tonnes actual versus 710 tonnes predicted, or a 35 per
cent difference) over 15 to 20 years, however mass wasting is more episodic
than the model predicts.