BACKGROUND. Hip fracture is a common problem among older Americans. Two typ
es of procedures are available for repairing hip fractures: hip replacement
and open or closed reduction with or without internal fixation. The assump
tion has been that hip replacement produces better functional outcomes. Alt
hough that is the common wisdom, outcome studies evaluating hip replacement
for treatment of hip fracture are few and have not clearly documented its
superiority.
OBJECTIVES. TO compare outcomes of hip fracture patients who receive hip re
placement versus another stabilizing procedure (open or closed reduction wi
th or without internal fixation).
DESIGN. Prospective cohort study.
PARTICIPANTS. We studied 332 patients (age, > 65) who were hospitalized for
a femoral neck fracture and discharged alive.
MEASUREMENTS. We examined 2 treatment groups, hip replacement versus anothe
r procedure, on 6 outcomes [Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), walking, liv
ing situation (institutionalized or not), perceived health (excellent/good
vs, fair/poor), rehospitalization, and mortality] at 3 postdischarge times
(6 weeks, 6 months and I year).
RESULTS. Mean age was 80, 80% were female, 96% White, 28% married, and 71%
had a hip replacement. The treatment groups were similar at baseline (3 mon
ths before admission as reported at discharge) on ADLs, walking, living sit
uation and perceived health tall P > 0.24). After adjusting for demographic
s, clinical characteristics, fracture characteristics, and prior ADLs, walk
ing ability, living situation, and perceived health, patients with a hip re
placement did not do better at 6 weeks,6 months, or I year post-discharge o
n any of the 6 outcome measures tall 18 P > 0.10). A global test of all 6 o
utcomes finds hip replacement patients doing less well at one year (P = 0.0
2).
CONCLUSIONS. Despite the commonly held belief that hip replacement is a sup
erior treatment for hip fracture, we found no suggestion of better outcomes
for hip replacement on any of 6 key outcomes.