Standardless quantitative electron-excited X-ray microanalysis by energy-dispersive spectrometry: What is its proper role?

Authors
Citation
De. Newbury, Standardless quantitative electron-excited X-ray microanalysis by energy-dispersive spectrometry: What is its proper role?, MICROS MICR, 4(6), 1998, pp. 585-597
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Multidisciplinary,"Spectroscopy /Instrumentation/Analytical Sciences
Journal title
MICROSCOPY AND MICROANALYSIS
ISSN journal
14319276 → ACNP
Volume
4
Issue
6
Year of publication
1998
Pages
585 - 597
Database
ISI
SICI code
1431-9276(199811/12)4:6<585:SQEXMB>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Electron beam X-ray microanalysis with semiconductor energy-dispersive spec trometry (EDS) performed with standards and calculated matrix corrections c an yield quantitative results with a distribution such that 95% of analyses fall within +/-5% relative for major and minor constituents. Standardless methods substitute calculations for the standard intensities, based either on physical models of X-ray generation and propagation (first principles) o r on mathematical fits to remotely measured standards (fitted standards). E rror distributions have been measured for three different standardless anal ysis procedures with a suite of microanalysis standards including metal all oys, glasses, minerals, ceramics, and stoichiometric compounds. For the fir st-principles standardless procedure, the error distribution placed 95% of analyses within +/-50% relative, whereas for two commercial fitted standard s procedures, the error distributions placed 95% of analyses within +/-25% relative. The implication of these error distributions for the accuracy of analytical results is considered, and recommendations for the use of standa rdless analysis are given.