L. Chidambaram et Rp. Bostrom, GROUP DEVELOPMENT .1. A REVIEW AND SYNTHESIS OF DEVELOPMENT MODELS, Group decision and negotiation, 6(2), 1997, pp. 159-187
This is the first of two parts that examine the issue of group develop
ment and its impact on the study and design of group support systems (
GSS). We review the various models of group development, analyze the s
ources of differences among these models, and synthesize common themes
across various models. The paper concludes with a meta-framework for
understanding group development; this framework highlights the two are
as of focus that have dominated group development research in the past
: group processes and outcomes. The second paper will build on the ide
as developed here and discuss the implications of group development fo
r GSS research. Previous research on group behavior suggests that grou
ps' change over time; patterns of change, referred to as group develop
ment models, have been an important area of study for the past four de
cades. For the first three of these decades, unitary models of group d
evelopment were very popular; that is, the notion that all groups go t
hrough a certain series of predefined stages. In the last decade, howe
ver, researchers have cast;doubt on such unitary models of group devel
opment. Nonsequential models that recognize the uniqueness of each gro
up (and consequently reject the idea of a single, predetermined series
of stages) have become increasingly popular. This paper examines the
implications of these issues for researchers and managers of groups. I
t also attempts to serve as the foundation for the propositions develo
ped in the next paper, in which the relevance of group development for
GSS research and practice are discussed.