Objective: To identify risk factors associated with brachial plexus injury
in a large population.
Methods: A computerized data set containing records from hospital discharge
summaries of mothers and infants and birth certificates was examined. The
deliveries took place in more than 300 civilian acute care hospitals in Cal
ifornia between January 1, 1994 and December 31, 1995. Cases of brachial pl
exus injury were evaluated for additional diagnoses and procedures of pregn
ancy, such as mode of delivery, gestational diabetes, and shoulder dystocia
. Those complications were stratified by birth weight and analyzed, using b
ivariate and multivariate techniques to identify specific risk factors.
Results: Among 1,094,298 women who delivered during the 2 years, 1611 (0.15
%) had diagnoses of brachial plexus injury. The frequency of diagnosis incr
eased with the addition of gestational diabetes (odds ratio [OR] 1.9, 95% c
onfidence interval [CI] 1.7, 2.1), forceps delivery (OR 3.4, 95% CT 2.7, 4.
3), vacuum extraction (OR 2.7, 95% CI 2.4, 3.1), and shoulder dystocia (OR
76.1, 95% CI 69, 84). In cases of brachial plexus injury, the frequency of
shoulder dystocia increased from 22%, when birth weight ranged between 2.5
and 3.5 kg. to 74%, when birth weight exceeded 4.5 kg. The frequency of dia
gnosis of other malpresentation (nonbreech) (OR 73.6, 95% CI 66, 83) was in
creased for all birth weight categories. Severe (OR 13.6, 95% CI 8.3, 22.5)
and mild (OR 6.3, 95% CI 3.9, 10.1) birth asphyxia were increased. prematu
rity (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.67, 0.98) and fetal growth restriction (OR 0.1, 95%
CI 0.03, 0.40) were protective against brachial plexus injury.
Conclusion: In macrosomic newborns, shoulder dystocia was associated with b
rachial plexus injury, but in low- and normal-weight infants, "other malpre
sentation" was diagnosed more frequently than shoulder dystocia. Our study
findings suggest that brachial plexus injury has causes in addition to shou
lder dystocia and might result from an abnormality during the antepartum or
intrapartum period. (Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:536-40. (C) 1999 by The Americ
an College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.).