In response to growing financial pressures, many academic institutions have
begun rewarding full-time faculty primarily on the basis of productivity.
This formula often over-rewards procedure-oriented specialists while poorly
compensating primary care physicians. Collections have little to do with c
linical effort, and rewarding productivity alone ignores the many other qua
lities important to the academic mission. We developed a simple, adjustable
plan for quantifying and rewarding faculty behavior consistent with the go
als of the institution. Eight categories are weighed by the departmental ch
airperson or committee, including previous year's salary, productivity, pat
ient satisfaction, administration, academic rank, teaching, research, and q
uality of care. This plan is flexible and rewards behavior consistent with
departmental priorities. It also allows for individual members of the depar
tment to increase their salaries by adjusting their behavior. As federal fu
nds for training continue to decrease, teaching, research, and other schola
rly activities might not be fairly compensated. Unless each institution pro
spectively develops a program that rewards those activities that the instit
ution values, many important scientific and educational activities will be
completely replaced by the more tangible efforts of patient care. (Obstet G
ynecol 1999; 93:614-8. (C) 1999 by The American College of Obstetricians an
d Gynecologists.).