In experiments investigating the voluntary provision of a pure public good,
participants consistently allocate resources to this good when the Nash pr
ediction is to allocate nothing. This paper explores the robustness of this
result when the Nash prediction calls for a division of resources between
the private and public goods. We consider how a change in individual resour
ce endowments and supplemental earnings information affect allocations to t
he public good. Results indicate that, under both the high and low endowmen
t conditions, groups continue to allocate more resources than the Nash pred
iction. However, providing participants with detailed instructions that des
cribe the declining marginal benefit to the public good leads to a signific
ant decrease in allocations to the public good.