We examined the incidence of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in publi
shed randomised clinical trials using calcitonin by parenteral injection or
intranasal spray. Trials were reviewed that compared calcitonin with place
bo, no therapy, or calcium with or without vitamin D, and that mentioned fr
acture as an outcome. Studies that compared the effect of calcitonin with o
ther active treatments were excluded. Fourteen trials with 1309 men and wom
en were identified. In the calcitonin and the control groups, vertebral and
non-vertebral fractures were summed and divided by the number of individua
ls originally allocated to the treatment groups. The relative risk of any f
racture for individuals taking calcitonin versus those not taking calcitoni
n was 0.43 (95% CI 0.38-0.50). The effect was apparent for both vertebral f
racture (RR 0.45; 95% CI 0.39-0.53) and non-vertebral fractures (RR 0.34; 9
5% CI 0.17-0.68). When studies identifying patients with fracture, rather t
han numbers of fractures were pooled, the magnitude of effect was less (RR
0.74; 95% CI 0.60-0.93), and the separate effects on vertebral and non-vert
ebral fractures was of borderline significance. We conclude that, within th
e limitations of this study, treatment with calcitonin is associated with a
significant decrease in the number of vertebral and non-vertebral fracture
s.