Previous literature on restaurant tipping has generally found that diner as
sessment of service quality is a weak explanator of tip size. We argue that
this finding is suspect because of two problems in the way service quality
is measured. First, in these studies service quality measures are based on
customer-supplied cardinal rankings of quality made after-the-fact. This f
alsely assumes interpersonal comparability of service. Second, quality rank
ings typically displayed very low variation because most diners reported se
rvice as having been good. If tipping is effective in promoting good servic
e, low variation in quality rankings will result and quality will be an ins
ignificant explanator of tips. We ask subjects how they would tip under hyp
othetical service quality scenarios, e.g. when service is "satisfactory," "
very good" and "poor." We survey 286 students at two universities in Minnes
ota and Alberta and find that service quality is actually a strong explanat
or of tips.