In four-stroke apparent motion displays, pattern elements oscillate between
two adjacent positions and synchronously reverse in contrast, but appear t
o move unidirectionally. For example, if rightward shifts preserve contrast
but leftward shifts reverse contrast, consistent rightward motion is seen.
In conventional first-order displays, elements reverse in luminance contra
st (e.g. light elements become dark, and vice-versa). The resulting percept
ion can be explained by responses in elementary motion detectors tuned to s
patio-temporal orientation. Second-order motion displays contain texture-de
fined elements, and there is some evidence that they excite second-order mo
tion detectors that extract spatio-temporal orientation following the appli
cation of a non-linear 'texture-grabbing' transform by the visual system. W
e generated a variety of second-order four-stroke displays, containing text
ure-contrast reversals instead of luminance contrast reversals, and used th
eir effectiveness as a diagnostic test for the presence of various forms of
non-linear transform in the second-order motion system. Displays containin
g only forward or only reversed phi motion sequences were also tested. Disp
lays defined by variation in luminance, contrast, orientation, and size wer
e effective. Displays defined by variation in motion, dynamism, and stereo
were partially or wholly ineffective. Results obtained with contrast-revers
ing and four-stroke displays indicate that only relatively simple non-linea
r transforms (involving spatial filtering and rectification) are available
during second-order energy-based motion analysis. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science
Ltd. All rights reserved.