Jm. Johnson et al., REHABILITATION OF DOGS WITH SURGICALLY TREATED CRANIAL CRUCIATE LIGAMENT-DEFICIENT STIFLES BY USE OF ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION OF MUSCLES, American journal of veterinary research, 58(12), 1997, pp. 1473-1478
Objective-To determine effect of electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) o
n rate and degree of return to function of the limb and development of
degenerative joint disease (DJD) after surgical creation and subseque
nt stabilization of the cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL)-deficient sti
fle. Animals-12 clinically normal adult large (19.5 to 31.5 kg) dogs.
Procedure-Dogs were anesthetized, and the right CrCL was severed via a
rthrotomy, destabilizing the stifle. After 3 weeks, the stifle was sur
gically stabilized. Three weeks later, 6 dogs were subjected to an EMS
treatment protocol for the thigh muscles. At 5, 9, 13, and 19 weeks a
fter stifle destabilization, treated in = 6) and control in = 6) dogs
were evaluated fcr return of stifle function. Gross and histologic eva
luations of the stifles were performed at 19 weeks after stifle destab
ilization. Results-Treated dogs had significantly (P = 0.001) better l
ameness score than did control dogs. There was less palpable crepitati
on of the stifle in treated dogs (P = 0.06); treated dogs also had sig
nificantly (P = 0.01) fewer radiographic signs of bone changes. Thigh
circumference was significantly (P = 0.02) larger in treated dogs. The
re was less gross cartilage damage (P = 0.07) in the EMS-treated dogs,
but more medial meniscal damage (P = 0.058, cranial pole; P = 0.051,
caudal pole). Conclusions-Improved lameness scores, larger thigh circu
mference, and decreased radiographically apparent bony changes observe
d for the treated group of dogs support the hypothesis that dogs treat
ed by EMS after surgical stabilization of the CrCL-deficient stifle ha
d improved limb function, with less DJD. than did dogs treated with th
e currently accepted clinical protocol of cage rest and slow return to
normal activity. However, results of force plate evaluation did not s
upport the hypothesis. Increased meniscal damage in dogs treated by EM
S may be cause for concern.