WHEN IS A COST-EFFECTIVENESS CLAIM VALID - HOW MUCH SHOULD THE FDA CARE

Citation
Br. Luce et Al. Hillman, WHEN IS A COST-EFFECTIVENESS CLAIM VALID - HOW MUCH SHOULD THE FDA CARE, American journal of managed care, 3(11), 1997, pp. 1660-1666
Citations number
33
Journal title
American journal of managed care
ISSN journal
10880224 → ACNP
Volume
3
Issue
11
Year of publication
1997
Pages
1660 - 1666
Database
ISI
SICI code
1096-1860(1997)3:11<1660:WIACCV>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Federal law requires the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to regulat e the promotional claims of prescription drugs and certain devices. St andards of evidence for claims of safety and therapeutic efficacy are rigorous because inappropriate product use may place human life at ris k. However, equally demanding criteria for claims of cost effectivenes s of marketed technologies seem to be unnecessary because the conseque nce of error is principally a bad buy rather than patient harm. Concer n exists about the validity of cost-effectiveness studies, the potenti al for bias, standards for the conduct of cost-effectiveness research, and the needs of managed care. The FDA should moderate its role in re gulating cost-effectiveness. claims of drugs and devices. This would f oster information flow to healthcare providers and insurers and protec t the FDA concern regarding false or misleading claims of effectivenes s. Although the issues are applicable to both devices and drugs, we dr aw mainly from the field of pharmacoeconomics because this is where mo st of the policy has developed.