This contribution compares a currently worn hearing instrument (i.e. R
-HI) with a programmable multiband full-dynamic range compression behi
nd-the-ear HI (i.e. T-HI), based on subject preference for HI, and, in
addition, compares the preference for a linear/non-linear amplificati
on-mode (i.e. L-mode/C-mode). Finally, it evaluates some health techno
logy aspects related to the devices. N = 34 experienced HI-users at a
median age of 72 years (range 22-84) completed the trial, n = 5 being
monaurally, and n = 29 being binaurally fitted. The trial comprises an
unblinded comparative study of the R-HI and T-HI, in either C-mode or
L-mode amplification, and a double-blind crossover study evaluating t
he C-mode versus the L-mode amplification. The results of the unblinde
d study showed that 94% (n = 32/34) preferred the T-HI, whereas two su
bjects preferred their current HI. The double-blind crossover study co
ncerning the preference for the C-mode and L-mode, respectively, in th
e T-HI, showed that 72% (n = 23/32) had a significant preference for t
he non-linear amplification, whereas 28% (n = 9/32) preferred the line
ar amplification. Provided that the price of the T-HI is kept unchange
d, a health technology evaluation may imply an estimate of 30 mill. DK
R added costs on a national basis, which should be taken into account
within the national hearing services.