V. Solorzano et al., ASSESSMENT OF SUITABLE DESIGNS FOR FIELD EXPERIMENTS INVOLVING AIRBORNE DISEASES, Journal of Agricultural Science, 129, 1997, pp. 249-256
The suitability was assessed of various designs for held experiments i
nvestigating plant diseases caused by airborne pathogens that can be s
ubject to interplot interference. Use of a model to describe such inte
rference showed that the treatments with the most dissimilar effects o
n controlling the disease should be allocated to experimental plots fu
rthest apart in each block, in order to minimize the interplot interfe
rence within a block. When using large square plots, rectangular block
s were more efficient than square blocks in minimizing treatment-compa
rison biases due to interference between neighbours. For rectangular b
locks with the square plots side by side, less biased treatment compar
isons were obtained from designs with complete blocks than from design
s with incomplete blocks, especially when larger numbers of treatments
were included in the experiment. However, when interplot variance is
taken into account, incomplete blocks may give better treatment compar
isons. Similarly, unbalanced designs composed only of incomplete block
s that yield less biased treatment comparisons may be better than bala
nced incomplete block designs when interplot variance is low. For high
levels of variation, balanced incomplete block designs may be more ap
propriate, as increasing the precision of the treatment comparisons be
comes more important than reducing the bias.