PURPOSE: To assess the clinical utility of GRASE (gradient-and spin-ec
ho) MR imaging of the brain by comparing it with the T2-weighted turbo
spin-echo technique. METHODS: Fifty-three consecutive patients referr
ed for MR imaging of the brain were studied with TZ-weighted turbo spi
n-echo and GRASE techniques, matched for effective echo time (110 mill
iseconds), echo train length (eight), and spatial resolution. The exam
inations were evaluated independently by two neuroradiologists for les
ion detection (high-and low-signal-intensity lesions) and lesion consp
icuity, and for susceptibility, motion, and chemical-shift artifacts.
RESULTS: The GRASE technique provided greater detection of both high-a
nd low-signal-intensity lesions and of low-signal-intensity lesions wi
th paramagnetic susceptibility characteristics (ie, calcium and hemorr
hage). Chemical-shift artifacts in the frequency-encoding direction we
re more prominent with the turbo spin-echo technique, whereas chemical
-shift artifacts in the phase-encoding direction were more prominent w
ith the GRASE technique. There was no significant difference in the de
gree of diamagnetic susceptibility artifacts at the base of the skull,
or in motion artifacts. CONCLUSION: T2-weighted GRASE is a fast imagi
ng technique with a potential for replacing turbo spin-echo in routine
MR imaging of the brain. GRASE maintains the contrast resolution of t
urbo spin-echo imaging and is better at depicting lesions with paramag
netic susceptibility characteristics.