Md. Lindner, RELIABILITY, DISTRIBUTION, AND VALIDITY OF AGE-RELATED COGNITIVE DEFICITS IN THE MORRIS WATER MAZE, Neurobiology of learning and memory, 68(3), 1997, pp. 203-220
In the present study, F-344 rats throughout 1.5 to 26 months of age we
re tested in the reference memory version, a moving-platform repeated
acquisition version, and in a cued platform version of the Morris wate
r maze. The results suggest that: (1) performance in the water maze de
clines continuously, beginning at the earliest age, and very closely f
its a linear function; (2) there are robust, reliable differences betw
een individuals in terms of their performance in the Morris water maze
, but chronological age accounts for only a fraction of the variance b
etween individuals; (3) there is no evidence of a bimodal distribution
among aged rats-there is no distinct subgroup of individuals that per
forms so poorly that they are qualitatively different from the majorit
y of the population, and distinctions between 'impaired'' and ''unimpa
ired'' subjects must be based on arbitrary criteria that may not be co
nsistent from one study to the next; (4) age-related deficits in the M
orris water maze may not be restricted to learning and memory, but may
also include deficits in attention, the ability to process spatial in
formation, and/or the ability to develop efficient spatial search stra
tegies; and (5) swim distance is the most appropriate measure of cogni
tive function in the Morris water maze, but the relationship between t
his measure and other measures of noncognitive function make it clear
that swim distance may not be a pure measure of cognitive function. Al
though the Morris water maze remains a valuable preclinical test with
better validity and specificity than many other behavioral tests, meas
ures of performance in the Morris water maze should not be considered
synonymous with cognitive function. (C) 1997 Academic Press.