The term riverine landscape implies a holistic geomorphic perspective
of the extensive interconnected series of biotopes and environmental g
radients that, with their biotic communities, constitute fluvial syste
ms. Natural disturbance regimes maintain multiple interactive pathways
(connectivity) across the riverine landscape. Disturbance and environ
mental gradients, acting in concert, result in a positive feedback bet
ween connectivity and spatio-temporal heterogeneity that leads to the
broad-scale patterns and processes responsible for high levels of biod
iversity. Anthropogenic impacts such as flow regulation, channelizatio
n, and bank stabilization, by (1) disrupting natural disturbance regim
es, (2) truncating environmental gradients, and (3) severing interacti
ve pathways, eliminate upstream-downstream linkages and isolate river
channels from riparian/floodplain systems and contiguous groundwater a
quifers. These alterations interfere with successional trajectories, h
abitat diversification, migratory pathways and other processes, thereb
y reducing biodiversity. Ecosystem management is necessary to maintain
or restore biodiversity at a landscape scale. To be effective, conser
vation efforts should be based on a solid conceptual foundation and a
holistic understanding of natural river ecosystems. Such background kn
owledge is necessary to re-establish environmental gradients, to recon
nect interactive pathways, and to reconstitute some semblance of the n
atural dynamics responsible for high levels of biodiversity. The chall
enge for the future lies in protecting the ecological integrity and bi
odiversity of aquatic systems in the face of increasing pressures on o
ur freshwater resources. This will require integrating sound scientifi
c principles with management perspectives that recognize floodplains a
nd groundwaters as integral components of rivers and that ave based on
sustaining, rather than suppressing, environmental heterogeneity. (C)
1998 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.