Objective. To compare the quality of bone scans obtained with (TC)-T-9
9m-ABP, a new radiopharmaceutical, and Tc-99m-MDP. Material and method
s. A comparative study within subjects was done in nine healthy volunt
eers, 5 female and 4 male, aged 23 to 39 years. The dose for both radi
opharmaceuticals was 740 MBq; radiopharmacokinetic parameters were det
ermined and a whole body bone scan was taken with a MultiSpect 2 gamma
camera two hours post administration with a wash-out period of 72 hou
rs between preparations. The images were independently evaluated by th
ree nuclear medicine physicians by drawing of regions of interest (ROI
s) on vertebrae, ribs, femur, sternum, joints and skull. Ratios bone/s
oft tissue were obtained drawing ROls on several bones. The kappa test
and the Wilcoxon rank test were used for statistical comparisons. Res
ults. The agreement on the quality of the images with Tc-ABP and Tc-MD
P was fair (kappa 0.4). The femur/soft tissue ratio had a normal distr
ibution and the Wilcoxon test showed no statistical difference between
preparations. Conclusions. Even though bone uptake was higher and fas
ter with Tc-ABP, the quality of the scans obtained with either radioph
armaceutical was similar. We recommend the use of Tc-ABP as a routine
bone scan agent because of its less radiation exposure to the patient.