Objective. The Neonatal Individualized Developmental Care Program (NID
CAP) for very low birth weight (VLBW) preterm infants has been suggest
ed by Als et al to improve several medical outcome variables such as t
ime an ventilator, time to nipple feed, the duration of hospital stay,
better behavioral performance on Assessment of Preterm Infants' Behav
ior (APIB), and improved neurodevelopmental outcomes. We have tested t
he hypothesis of whether the infants who had received NIDCAP would sho
w advanced sleep-wake pattern, behavioral, and neurodevelopmental outc
ome. Methods. Thirty-five VLBW infants were randomly assigned to recei
ve NIDCAP or routine infant care. The goals for NIDCAP intervention we
re to enhance comfort and stability and to reduce stress and agitation
for the preterm infants by: a) altering the environment by decreasing
excess light and noise in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and
by using covers over the incubators and cribs; b) use of positioning
aids such as boundary supports, nests, and buntings to promote a balan
ce of flexion and extension postures; c) modification of direct hands-
on caregiving to maximize preparation of infants for, tolerance of, an
d facilitation of recovery from interventions; d) promotion of self-re
gulatory behaviors such as holding on, grasping, and sucking; e) atten
tion to the readiness for and the ability to take oral feedings; and f
) involving parents in the care of their infants as much as possible.
The infants' sleep was recorded at 36 weeks postconceptional age (PCA)
and at 3 months corrected age (CA) using the Motility Monitoring Syst
em (MMS), an automated, nonintrusive procedure for determining sleep s
tate from movement and respiration patterns. Behavioral and developmen
tal outcome was assessed by the Neurobehavioral Assessment of Me Prete
rm Infant (NAPI) at 36 weeks PCA, the APIB at 42 weeks PCA, and by the
Bayley Stales of Infant Development (BSID) at 4, 12, and 24 months CA
. Results. Sleep developmental measures at 3 months CA showed a clear
developmental change compared with 36 weeks PCA. These include: increa
sed amount of quiet sleep, reduced active sleep and indeterminate slee
p, decreased arousal, and transitions during sleep. Longest sleep peri
od at night showed a clear developmental effect (increased) when compa
ring nighttime sleep pattern of infants at 3 months with those at 36 w
eeks of age. Day-night rhythm of sleep-wake increased significantly fr
om 36 weeks PCA to 3 months CA. However, neither of these sleep develo
pmental changes showed any significant effects of NIDCAP intervention.
Although all APIB measures showed better organized behavior in NIDCAP
patients, neither NAPI nor Bayley showed any developmental advantages
for the intervention group. The neurodevelopmental outcome measured b
y the Bayley at 4, 12, and 24 months CA showed 64% of the NIDCAP inter
vention group at the lowest possible score compared with 33% of the co
ntrol group. These findings could not be explained by the occurrence o
f intraventricular hemorrhage or the socioeconomic status of the paren
ts, which showed no significant group effect. Conclusion. The results
of this study, including measures of sleep maturation and neurodevelop
mental outcome up to 2 years of age did not demonstrate that the NIDCA
P intervention results in increased maturity or development. Buehler e
t al (Pediatrics. 1995;96:923-932) have reported that premature infant
s (N = 12; mean gestational age 32 weeks, mean birth weight 1700 g) wh
o received developmental care compared with a similar group of infants
who received routine care showed better organized behavioral performa
nce on an APIB assessment at 42 weeks PCA. None of the medical outcome
measures were significantly different in this study. Although our API
B results are in agreement, the results of the NAPI, the Bayley and sl
eep measures do not show an increase in neurodevelopmental maturation.
In the earlier report by Als et al (journal of the American Medical A
ssociation. 1994;272:853-858), both medical and neurofunctional improv
ements were found in very low birth weight premature infants (mean ges
tational age 27 weeks, mean birth weight similar to S70 g) in which 20
infants who received NIDCAP were compared with 18 infants who receive
d routine care. At 42 weeks PCA the APIB was better in the interventio
n group as was the Bayley at 6 months CA. Later neurodevelopmental ass
essments in this study population have not been reported. Furthermore,
as was indicated in the editorial by Merenstein in the same issue of
the Journal of the American Medical Association, a significant problem
with the study was that the number of intraventricular hemorrhages wa
s higher in the control group (10 of 18 vs 1 of 20) and the study was
conducted before the widespread use of surfactant and prenatal steroid
s. The study was performed in a single nursery with nurses who volunte
ered for developmental intervention and cared for the experimental gro
up. No assessment was performed on differences in nursing, interventio
n, lighting, or sound between the two groups. Apnea, bradycardia, and
desaturation data were not reported also. NIDCAP has been shown to red
uce stress and agitation in the infants in our study (Heller C, et al.
Journal of Perinatology. 1997;17:107-112); however, there was no diff
erence in the incidence of apnea or bradycardia. Additional studies ar
e needed to determine which specific interventions facilitate recovery
in the high-risk preterm infant when interventions are efficacious, w
hat may be adverse or ineffective, and what mechanisms are involved. D
istinctions should be made between medical improvement, neurobehaviora
l responses (APIB) and neurodevelopmental maturation. Not only the dur
ation of NICU hospitalization, but indeed, long-term outcomes must be
carefully evaluated. We recommend that clinicians should be aware that
preterm infants who have received NIDCAP during their hospitalization
do not appear to be more mature at the time of discharge home.