Pj. Nelson, CONFLICT, LEGITIMACY, AND EFFECTIVENESS - WHO SPEAKS FOR WHOM IN TRANSNATIONAL NGO NETWORKS LOBBYING THE WORLD-BANK, Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 26(4), 1997, pp. 421-441
Networks of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) have gained a measure
of influence in policy and finding debates for the multilateral devel
opment banks, particularly the World Bank (WE). Addressing organizatio
ns owned and governed by member states, they have raised issues of env
ironmental impact, economic and social justice, political participatio
n, and the rights of minorities (sometimes majorities) usually exclude
d from national and global decision making. With their success have co
me pressures that reveal tensions and contradictions in the networks'
representation, agenda setting, self-governance, and claims to legitim
acy. These tensions can be traced to the networks' position in a chang
ing international political economy. They have weakened the NGOs' infl
uence with the WE and its major member states and are now stimulating
proposals anti initiatives to change the networks' self-governance.