T. Erkinjuntti et al., THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA ON THE PREVALENCE OF DEMENTIA, The New England journal of medicine, 337(23), 1997, pp. 1667-1674
Background There are several widely used sets of criteria for the diag
nosis of dementia, but little is known about their degree of agreement
and their effects on estimates of the prevalence of dementia. Methods
We examined 1879 men and women 65 years of age or older who were enro
lled in the Canadian Study of Health and Aging and calculated the prop
ortion given a diagnosis of dementia according to six commonly used cl
assification systems: the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnosti
c and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), third edition (DSM
-III), the third edition, revised, of the DSM (DSM-III-R), the fourth
edition of the DSM (DSM-IV), the World Health Organization's Internati
onal Classification of Diseases (ICD), 9th revision (ICD-9) and 10th r
evision (ICD-10), and the Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders o
f the Elderly (CAMDEX). The degree of concordance among classification
schemes and the importance of various factors in determining diagnost
ic agreement or disagreement were examined. Results The proportion of
subjects with dementia varied from 3.1 percent when we used the criter
ia of the ICD-10 to 29.1 percent when the DSM-III criteria were used.
The six classification systems identified different groups of subjects
as having dementia; only 20 subjects were given a diagnosis of dement
ia according to all six systems. The classifications based on the vari
ous systems differed little according to the patients' age, sex, educa
tional level, or status with respect to institutionalization. The fact
ors that most often caused disagreement in diagnosis between DSM-III a
nd ICD-10 were long-term memory, executive function, social activities
, and duration of symptoms. Conclusions The commonly used criteria for
diagnosis can differ by a factor of 10 in the number of subjects clas
sified as having dementia. Such disagreement has serious implications
for research and treatment, as well as for the right of many older per
sons to drive, make a will, and handle financial affairs. (C) 1997, Ma
ssachusetts Medical Society.